Author: Constitution Watchdog

The constitutional framework faces a profound challenge regarding the executive branch’s assertion of authority to unilaterally impose substantial tariffs, effectively exercising the sovereign power of taxation without explicit legislative sanction. The core dispute centers on whether a president may, by invoking emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), transform the statutory authority to merely “regulate” international commerce into an unconstrained power to levy taxes. This question strikes at the very foundation of the separation of powers and the constitutional doctrine that vests the power of the purse exclusively in the Congress, a principle the Framers deemed essential…

Read More

The prevailing constitutional discourse centers intensely on the proposed contours of the 27th Constitutional Amendment, marking a critical juncture in the structure of governance and the distribution of state power. Factual reporting indicates that a high-level delegation from the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, formally solicited the support of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), including its Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari and President Asif Ali Zardari, to secure the requisite supermajority for its enactment. The proposed amendment is a multifaceted legislative initiative intended to introduce several significant modifications to the 1973 Constitution, thereby fundamentally altering key institutional…

Read More

The constitutional jurisprudence surrounding the 15th Amendment has entered a critical phase, marked by the recent filing of an appeal before the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court. This petition, lodged by Senior Advocate Sharif Bhuiyan on behalf of Badiul Alam Majumder, the Secretary of Shushashoner Jonno Nagorik (Shujan), seeks the complete and comprehensive annulment of the entire 15th Constitutional Amendment. This action directly challenges the High Court verdict rendered on 17 December of the preceding year, which, while invalidating specific clauses, stopped short of voiding the amendment in its entirety, leading to the current judicial contention over residual constitutional…

Read More

The current constitutional dialogue is dominated by the nascent, yet potent, convergence of the two principal political forces regarding a fundamental overhaul of the legislative branch. Initiated by the executive, the core proposal calls for a significant reduction in the size of the Assembly, specifically from the present 140 seats to a more streamlined 101. This legislative ambition is receiving calculated endorsement from the opposition leader, who has advanced a complementary structural amendment: the adoption of a bicameral system, introducing a Senate of the Republic concurrent with the reduction of parliamentary representation. This mutual accommodation signals the potential for a…

Read More

The establishment of a high-level Task Force for the revitalization of basic education in Gombe State, as recently authorized by Governor Muhammadu Inuwa Yahaya and announced through the Secretary to the State Government, Professor Ibrahim Njodi, presents a compelling case study in the deployment of executive prerogative for sub-national sectoral remediation. This administrative action, focused squarely on enhancing quality learning outcomes across primary and junior secondary education, signifies a pronounced gubernatorial commitment to reinforcing the education sector as a central pillar of human capital development, consistent with the foundational principles enshrined in Chapter II of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).…

Read More

The constitutional landscape in Zimbabwe is currently defined by a significant challenge to the fundamental principle of executive term limits, a cornerstone provision enshrined in the 2013 Constitution. The crisis stems from the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) party’s formal adoption of a resolution to extend the tenure of President Emmerson Mnangagwa beyond the constitutionally mandated two terms, specifically seeking to prolong the current term from its scheduled end in 2028 to 2030. This resolution, adopted at the party’s 2025 annual conference, explicitly directed the Secretary of Legal Affairs and Minister of Justice to initiate the required legislative…

Read More

The Constitutional Reform Council, operating under the authoritative chairmanship of Justice Minister Srbuhi Galyan, has recently convened to deliberate on critical systemic adjustments within the constitutional architecture. The substantive agenda included a thorough review of existing provisions governing the immunity afforded to public officials, alongside a detailed evaluation of the structural integrity and independent status of various autonomous bodies. From this session, the Ministry of Justice confirmed that the Council determined the necessity of establishing clear procedural guidelines specifically concerning the formation and operational functionality of autonomous institutions, representing a tangible step toward codified administrative clarity for these entities. Crucially,…

Read More

The current constitutional landscape in Connecticut is marked by an active confluence of criminal dismissals and ongoing federal civil litigation, centering on the permissible scope of First Amendment activity on public infrastructure, specifically highway overpasses. This development provides a critical case study in the tension between state police authority, public safety concerns, and the fundamental right to political dissent. Dismissal of Criminal Charges and Its Implications In a highly relevant development in late October 2025, the State Attorney in Connecticut formally moved to dismiss all criminal charges against protestor Katherine Hinds, a leader of the Connecticut Visibility Brigade. Ms. Hinds…

Read More

The current constitutional situation demanding immediate scrutiny in New York centers on the Even-Year Election Law (EYEL), a 2023 legislative enactment which mandates the consolidation of most town and county elections with the higher-turnout federal and state-level contests in even-numbered years. This issue has transitioned from an unsuccessful challenge grounded in the New York State Constitution’s Home Rule provision—a challenge which was unanimously rejected by the New York Court of Appeals on October 16, 2025—to a novel and structurally significant action in the federal judiciary. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the complaint…

Read More

The constitutional posture of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has intensified following the Ninth Circuit’s recent unanimous, published decision in Nat’l Lab. Rels. Bd. v. N. Mountain Foothills Apartments, issued on October 28, 2025. This ruling directly rejected three fundamental constitutional challenges to the Board’s structure and remedial authority, deepening an existing circuit split that portends an inevitable resolution by the Supreme Court of the United States. Specifically, the Ninth Circuit upheld the Board against contentions that the for-cause removal protections for its members and Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) violate Article II, that its adjudicatory system and enhanced remedies…

Read More